Among the earliest canards – something I’ve written about before, in fact – may be the proven fact that ladies don’t like intercourse, particularly casual intercourse, just as much as males do. It’s the main topic of numerous a hot debate, the punchline to hacky comedians’ jokes and also the back ground sound in films and sitcoms since more or less forever. We’re given any amount of known reasons for this, from the classic “sperm is cheap/eggs are costly” evo-psych rationale to the greater amount of mercenary “women utilize intercourse for barter” market view of peoples sex. This supposed disparity adult cams between male and female libidos is element of what drives a great deal of Pick-Up Artists strategies, of Red-Pill rage and several a rant from anime-avatar’d randos on Twitter whenever people dare to suggest otherwise.
The ur-evidence of the belief could be the Clark-Hatfield that is infamous study that was posted in 1989 and replicated again and again by YouTube pranksters as “social experiments” from the time.
Needless to say, the research ended up being fatally flawed; since was described often times, Johnny Rando rolling through to a university campus and asking chicks to bang him betrays a lack that is rather severe of calibration at most useful. But despite its flaws and mistaken conclusions, it hangs in included in the accepted knowledge of sex relations.
(needless to say, the heteronormative focus with this causes the theory to break apart the moment homo- and bisexuality are introduced to the mix, to state absolutely nothing of trans gents and ladies… but hey, why let facts block off the road of closely held thinking?)
Nevertheless, new research posted within the journal Archives of Sexual Behavior drives house just why the Clark-Hatfield research ended up being incorrect and – more notably – why women can be therefore reluctant to state “yes” to sex that is casual. 阅读更多