Justice Martha Koome whom offered a dissenting viewpoint, saying the Supreme Court need to determine whether a guy can marry a female without permission. File, Standard
The Court of Appeal is finished a female’s try to proceed to the Supreme Court and contest a discovering that she ended up being hitched to a guy that is claiming their share of home that is registered in her own title.
Based on Ms Nyambura, it really is up against the Constitution for a court to impose a wedding where there clearly was dispute on whether both ongoing parties had mutually consented to live as wife and husband.
Her attorney, Mithega Mugambi, had argued that Nyambura had been hitched to a different man thus could perhaps not qualify to marry Ogari.
But Ogari’s attorney, Moses Siagi, opposed the full situation saying it absolutely was maybe not of general public interest. He argued that the difficulties raised in the application form are not ahead of the High Court hence they ought to never be permitted to spill to your court that is top.
The verdict for the three-judge work work bench had been split, with two judges decreasing to permit her application although the judge that is third the scenario raised noble concerns when it comes to Supreme Court to stay. 阅读更多